Mr. Knight was convicted of possessing more than 20 grams of cannabis. On appeal, he argued he should have been acquitted because the evidence against him was entirely circumstantial and a reasonable hypothesis of innocence existed that the state failed to refute. The Fifth District Court of Appeal upheld the conviction but certified conflict with other Florida appellate courts in decisions dealing with circumstantial evidence and a defendant’s reasonable hypothesis of innocence.

Click on the links to watch more oral arguments from 4/7/15:

Joseph B. Doerr Trust, et al., v. Central Florida Expressway Authority, et al., SC14-1007

Walter Headley Jr., et al. v. City of Miami, SC13-1882